🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.