🔗 Share this article

Mainstream political parties are more and more enabling the radical right to set the public discourse, according to a new study conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Academics discovered that this phenomenon has unwittingly benefited far-right parties by validating their viewpoints and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Based on Over 20 Years of News Reporting

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, relied on an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 articles from six German newspapers.

Capital-based scholars observed that as the far right moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to core themes like integration and migration, established political groups increasingly adjusted their messaging in response.

This adjustment amplified the spread of these ideas and signaled to voters that such positions were legitimate.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Political communication by mainstream parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the far right," explained a political sociologist involved in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional parties were condemning the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the researcher commented. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is crucial."

Mainstreaming Effect Throughout the Continent

While the research was centered around Germany, this normalisation effect is likely to apply to nations across Europe.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," said another co-author. "Radical groups says something and everybody starts talking about it for one week."

"Even if you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At certain points, leaders have also hardened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recently published interview, a then national leader advocated widespread deportations and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Similar instances can be found throughout the continent, as politicians from nations including the UK to France embrace the rhetoric of the radical right, especially on migration.

This has formed an echo chamber that was inconceivable a decade ago.

Core Problem: Who Dictates the Narrative?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are discussing cultural issues – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the pace of the radical right, that's the essence of agenda setting," clarified a study author.

Other political parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the hardline agenda of the radical right, even as studies suggests that doing so leads the electorate to vote for the radical faction.

Gradual Impact and Voter Awareness

The extent of data gathered showed that the influence of radical parties had been progressive and had increased over time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from one day to another," commented a researcher. "However, when you hear this negative framing around migration every second week, and it is being spread not only by radical groups but also, for example, by mainstream parties, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Need for Mainstream Parties to Develop Their Own Narratives

The study emphasized the need for mainstream political parties to carve out their own discourses, particularly on subjects such as migration and assimilation, rather than constantly trailing after the far right.

"It's like a dance," said one researcher. "If the conductor is radical and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which tune should be playing."